Phishing-as-a-Service has turned credential theft into a subscription business. Attackers rent complete phishing infrastructure that includes templates replicating legitimate login pages, hosting, credential capture, and tools that bypass MFA.
The platforms operate like standard SaaS companies, with customer support, regular updates, and competitive marketplaces where providers differentiate on features and reliability. This model has removed technical barriers to running phishing campaign, and organizations now face more attacks from more sources using increasingly sophisticated methods.
The PhaaS Business Model
PhaaS providers make money by handling all the technical complexity that used to require specialized skills. They maintain servers, update templates to match current login pages, develop anti-detection measures, and keep infrastructure running. Attackers pay for access and focus on target selection and social engineering.
One platform can support thousands of simultaneous campaigns, which makes the subscription model profitable even at relatively low price points. Meanwhile, attackers get professional-grade tools without building or maintaining their own infrastructure.
The marketplace has developed normal competitive dynamics. Providers advertise capabilities on forums and compete on bypass rates and template quality. Some charge monthly subscriptions, others take fees per campaign or per stolen credential, and a few claim a percentage of successful compromises. Some even offer money-back guarantees.
How PhaaS Attacks Work
PhaaS platforms provide template libraries that look just like legitimate login pages: Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, banking sites, and dozens of other services. They copy design elements, branding, and URL structures accurately, with many services scraping real login pages regularly to keep their templates current.
When victims enter credentials on a phishing page, a proxy server captures the information while forwarding it to the actual service. The login completes successfully. Victims access their real accounts with no immediate indication of compromise.
Modern PhaaS kits capture entire authentication sessions, not just passwords. When victims complete MFA, the platform intercepts the authentication token. Attackers receive valid session tokens that grant access without touching the MFA process.
This works because the proxy sits between the victim and the legitimate service during the entire authentication flow. Real-time notifications alert attackers when credentials are captured. Many platforms include automated validation to confirm credentials work and identify access levels.
The Verizon 2025 Data Breach Investigations Report claims that stolen credentials were involved in 22% of breaches, with phishing and credential abuse remaining top initial access vectors.
Post-Compromise: What Attackers Do Next
Compromised credentials open access to sensitive data, financial systems, and internal communications. But the real damage depends on what privileges those credentials carry.
If attackers compromise an account with administrative rights, they can install malware, modify security settings, access protected data, create backdoor accounts, and move laterally across the network with minimal resistance. A single compromised admin account can become a foothold for ransomware deployment, data exfiltration, or business email compromise schemes.
The FBI’s Internet Crime Complaint Center reported that business email compromise attacks resulted in losses of $2.77 billion in 2024. These attacks typically begin with phishing campaigns that target accounts with elevated access or the ability to authorize financial transactions.
Attackers often remain undetected for weeks or months. During this dwell time, they map networks, identify valuable assets, and position themselves before executing final objectives. The longer they stay hidden, the more damage they can inflict.
Why Training Falls Short
Security awareness training reduces successful phishing attacks. Organizations that train employees to recognize suspicious emails, verify sender addresses, and pause before clicking links see measurable improvements. But training has fundamental limitations against PhaaS attacks.
PhaaS platforms have made phishing emails difficult to distinguish from legitimate communications. Templates are pixel-perfect copies, and URLs look correct or close enough to pass quick inspection. Timing also often matches expected communications: password reset requests after actual service outages, invoice emails at month-end.
Even security-conscious employees struggle to identify these attacks consistently. Training also can’t keep pace with PhaaS evolution. Providers update templates, develop new evasion techniques, and adapt to defensive measures faster than organizations can update training programs.
The core problem is that modern work requires constant interaction with external parties and services. Employees click links in emails, log into various platforms, and respond to requests throughout the day. Training can’t eliminate these workflows without breaking how people actually work.
The Privilege Problem
PhaaS attacks are so damaging because most organizations still grant administrative rights far too broadly. Users get admin privileges since it’s easier than managing exceptions, troubleshooting elevation requests, or dealing with helpdesk tickets for software installations.
When attackers compromise these accounts through phishing, they don’t just get access to email or files. They get the ability to install malware, disable security tools, modify system configurations, and move laterally to other systems. The compromised credentials become a weapon because of the privileges attached to them.
This is where architecture decisions matter more than training. You can have the best security awareness program in the world, but if one successful phishing attack gives attackers admin rights across your environment, you’re still vulnerable.
Limiting Damage Through Privilege Management
Effective defense against PhaaS attacks requires accepting that credentials will eventually get compromised and focusing on what attackers can actually do when that happens.
The solution is removing standing administrative privileges and replacing them with just-in-time elevation. Users work with standard privileges for normal tasks. When they need elevated access, they get it for specific actions or time-limited windows, not permanently.
How This Stops PhaaS Attacks
When attackers compromise credentials through phishing, they get whatever access level that account normally has. If the account runs with standard user privileges (because admin rights are only granted when needed), the compromised credentials have limited value.
Attackers can’t install malware without elevation, can’t modify security settings without elevation, or access protected systems without elevation. The phishing attack succeeds, but the damage gets contained because the compromised account doesn’t carry the privileges needed for serious impact.
Time-Limited Access Shrinks the Window
Admin By Request’s EPM product provides two elevation modes that address different use cases:
Admin Sessions give users time-limited periods of elevated access. A developer who needs to run multiple elevated tasks over an hour can start an Admin Session, complete their work, and have privileges automatically revoke when the timer expires. If attackers compromise these credentials during an active session, they have a narrow window before access expires.
Run As Admin elevates individual applications in a sandboxed environment. Users right-click an application, select Run As Admin, and only that specific process runs elevated while the rest of the system remains at standard privilege levels. If attackers compromise the account, they can’t leverage that single elevated process to install malware or modify the system.
Both approaches dramatically reduce what compromised credentials can accomplish compared to accounts with permanent admin rights.
Approval Workflows Add Verification
Organizations can require approval before granting elevation. When a user requests elevated access, an admin reviews and approves (or denies) the request. If attackers compromise credentials and attempt to elevate privileges, the approval workflow creates a checkpoint where suspicious activity gets caught.
For organizations that want to balance security with productivity, Admin By Request’s EPM solution offers automated approval options:
- Pre-approval rules allow specific applications (verified by file location, vendor certificate, or checksum) to elevate automatically without manual approval
- Machine Learning automatically approves applications after they’ve been manually approved a set number of times
- AI-based approval uses application and vendor popularity scores to determine which software can elevate without review
These features let IT teams create policies that grant automatic elevation for trusted applications while requiring review for unknown or suspicious requests. If attackers try to run malware through compromised credentials, it hits the approval requirement.
OPSWAT Integration Catches Malware
Admin By Request EPM also includes integrated OPSWAT MetaDefender scanning. Before any elevation request completes, the application gets checked against reputation databases from over 20 antivirus vendors.
If attackers use compromised credentials to try installing malware, the OPSWAT check catches it before elevation occurs. Suspicious or malicious files get blocked or quarantined for security team review, even if the user (or attacker using their credentials) has approval to elevate.
Full Audit Trail Reveals Compromise
Every elevation request, approval, and elevated action gets logged. IT teams can see exactly what got elevated, when, by whom, and what happened during elevated sessions.
When attackers use compromised credentials, they typically exhibit different behavior than the legitimate user: attempting to run unfamiliar applications, requesting elevation at unusual times, or trying to access systems they don’t normally touch. The audit logs provide visibility into this activity, helping security teams detect compromises faster and understand the scope of the breach.
Build Security Architecture That Assumes Failure
Training employees to recognize phishing remains valuable. But organizations that rely primarily on training are betting their security on perfect human performance against increasingly sophisticated attacks.
The more effective approach is accepting that phishing will eventually succeed and building systems that limit what attackers can do with stolen credentials. When compromised accounts run with standard privileges instead of permanent admin rights, the blast radius of a successful phishing attack shrinks dramatically.
Ready to see our solutions in action? Try our free plan for up to 25 endpoints, or book a demo today.
